Jonas Merckx vs Issam Haitham Taweel Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
L W L L W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Merckx 1 - 0 Taweel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Merckx winning 2 and Taweel winning 0. The last match between Merckx and Taweel was at the Egypt F36, 19-10-2015, First, Hard with Jonas Merckx getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jonas Merckx | 1 |
| Issam Haitham Taweel | 0 |
Egypt F36(19-10-2015)
6
3
6
3
| Merckx | Stats | Taweel |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 443 | Highest Rank | 635 |
| 31 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (207-148) | Career Total W/L | 41% (184-270) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Jonas Merckx
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:14:0 | Average Match Time | 1:14:0 |
| 54% (28/52) | 1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) |
| 89% (25/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 31% (16/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jonas Merckx Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Merckx
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Merckx
Player
Martim Leote Prata
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Merckx
Player
Maxime Tchoutakian
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jonas Merckx
50%
(
51 of
102)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
73)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Merckx
Player
Simon Carr
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Merckx
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Jonas Merckx
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Merckx
Player
Nico Mertens
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Issam Haitham Taweel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Mattia Bellucci
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Niklas Johansson
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (207/148) | Win/Loss | 41% (184/270) |
| 57% (460/349) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (429/610) |
| 53% (3849/3408) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (4433/5048) |
| 63% (100/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (101/166) |
| 57% (100/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (83/104) |
| 35% (7/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 397 | Aces Total | 496 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 873 | Total Double Faults | 479 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 572.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.52 |
| 55% (6777/12295) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6113/9753) |
| 67% (4539/6777) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (3941/6113) |
| 47% (2611/5518) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1656/3640) |
| 48% (769/1591) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (300/789) |
| 46% (5782/12613) | Return Points Win % | 36% (3343/9285) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (7/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (200/138) | Futures W/L | 41% (182/266) |
| 59% (207/353) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (182/448) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 54% (38/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (42/99) |
| 54% (55/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (69/127) |
| 88% (208/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (179/150) |
| 13% (208/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (179/29) |
| 17% (147/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (275/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
